Minister Maroni rap European institutions guilty of having left Italy only to manage the emergence of the refugee crisis sudmediterranea.
Landings Tunisian and Algerian, arrived over the number in the space of nearly six thousand a month allow a projection of about eighty thousand new arrivals within a year, a real "disaster" humanitarian.
Maroni is right and wrong.
autoassolve wrong when his ministry, a government that respects must be able to analyze the events, predict the consequences and are preparing all the necessary measures to avoid their effects more dangerous.
's now two months that Tunisia and Algeria, and not only they, are inflamed by rioting and heavy there wanted not an expert out of the War Academy in West Point to see which ones could be a good reason (or perhaps I should talk about good excuse, but the effect does not change) for redundancy and escapes to freedom. "
We have an ally - at least that is presented to us - Gaddafi, who have promised money and aid to Libya act in some way by the Coast Guard of North African shores, to curb the unwanted departure of illegal immigrants to our shores.
A government should have foresight, to the first Tunisia signs of crisis, plans to be hijacked and reception of fugitives towards the Libyan coast and manage there, away from home, the situation.
a minimum would have been enough political will, coupled with good information channels and a few patrol placed off the Tunisian coast to keep out the prospect, foreseeable and imminent, the humanitarian devastation.
The boundary begins to defend it across the border.
but the will and competence, like the courage in the words of Don Abbondio, if not you do not have any one can give and Maroni, which can not be charged the full brunt of this situation, does the fire with firewood is found.
The Minister of Interior has, however, because the European institutions in charging of total indifference to what Italy can go to suffer in the coming months.
If our country is suffering the consequences of a real lack of credibility on the international level, the satrap of laughing Arcore has contributed decisively to create with his congenital lack of seriousness, what makes Italy, at least as diplomatic and political weight, a third world country in Europe has she wanted to go down the route of low or no foreign policy profile. Before
industrial and economic power in the world with an unprecedented degree of social progress, Europe seems to have decided not to take the geopolitical important in this world that is increasingly multipolar.
not giving up, of course, Great Britain (as it has little of Europe), France and Germany, they do not close a case after more and more important contacts, economic and military, with Russia.
But they do it, not Europe, their strong secular political experience have well understood that this colossal reality is like an ox, strong, durable and (economically) but without the driving attributes.
This enormous socio-economic area, (with all its huge flaws, it is clear) is strong, rich, civil and social progress (at least when compared to the rest of the world) but has lost in agility because of an obsessive and parasitic bureaucracy that has sucked what ever possessed: the will, the ability to give themselves a destiny, the meaning of life.
but not heads of state bureaucrats, not politicians, but most bankers, but officials no longer strategic.
Without the former, are the second in command.
short, Europe has lost what Aymeric Chauprade called the 'horizon of war "that will not mean the war, hoped to practice or policy of aggression, aggressive attitude to take, no sir, it means keeping as a last option, and be willing to adopt it if the case requires, the use of force knowing that their partners have full consciousness.
A "horizon of war" we have the United States and its Anglo-Saxon allies, do you have Russia, China have it, do you have Israel, do you have India, 't have many of the Islamic nations.
while Europe, when he sent out his soldiers (and the point here is not whether it was right or wrong), he did by hiding under the skirts of Uncle Sam, who were shouting "peace missions".
What if it does its steel, its industrial production, its technological development, its industry, its social progress, its brains, its two thousand years of civilization if, in addition to all these beautiful things is not able, when necessary of banging their fists on the table to gain respect? And especially in the first person to do?
may be strong, agile and intimidating as a bull, but here we have only one ox, obedient and above all mass weighted, catatonic and resigned.
0 comments:
Post a Comment