Friday, December 31, 2010
Write An Acrostic Poem For Summer
Chronicle at the time informed us that during his last trip to Brazil Silvietta ours, perhaps energized by the climate, he performed in telling some jokes a bit 'bawdy but then, once back together, urging the president Lula to secure the extradition of Battisti. We know how
turned out, Baptists, such as Lollo (which unlike the first, however, could rely on the limitation of the sentence) will not be shown in Italy.
not bothered though, in all this, the law and the status of "political prisoners" as Baptists can not enjoy this assignment, two among the various murders that cost him a total of two life sentences, relate to acts of violence that "political" have nothing, it was consumed posthumous revenge against people who, previously, had dared to respond to attempted robbery perpetrated by Baptists and his gang, mafia-style revenge executed.
As the political crime (the one that according to international conventions generally accepted justification for refusal of extradition) determined that "in whole or in part by political motives" (so that even a common crime, such as a robbery to flow, is in this sense) is obviously the action plays a causal role crucial in the allocation of that capacity.
It is not clear how the volontàa of posthumous revenge against "ordinary" people who acted in legitimate defense to defend against attempted robbery could fall into the scheme of "political crime".
And in fact it is not the recognition of this fact that has legitimized the denial.
In the Extradition Treaty between Italy and Brazil, is established as the final proviso of a possible denial, the threat of extradition is requested in the execution of the sentence in the requesting country, may be subjected to persecution for racial, religious, political.
E 'on this basis and not on the (nonexistent) "political nature" of the crimes who has played the game of Baptists.
It 's all laugh. What more could ever risk persecution in the execution of the sentence?
The fundamentals of Brazil are a joke decision.
E 'clear then that the "right" in all this has nothing to do, because he now has a treaty for the game played with dice and iron policy in which Italy has lost, showing all his littleness. But is it any wonder?
What image can never offer the seriousness and determination to a nation represented by a bar jokes like Berlusconi? Who could take seriously a comedian?
The form and substance: the clothes make the Monaco, the soldier and also the fool.
And it is just before this last figure that President Lula has to be understood: then what do you think may have given weight to its demands.
It 's a key to understanding paradoxical? Certainly yes, but through the paradox can get to the truth.
What is this joke to those who hurt, the joke dies.
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Cartman Clown Hat Audio Clip
the aphorism aphorism
But you really like Wagner? - Of course, even though every time I hear it I want to invade Poland!
-Woody Allen-
Baby Shower Invites To Out Of Town Guestswording
THE DAY OF THE DAY
Politicians have their own ethics. All of them. And it's a notch below that of a sex maniac.
-WOODY ALLEN-
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Baby Oil Dries My Skin
JOKE JOKE FOR THE GREAT AND
We have been informed of this by advertising for a long time that the Channel 5 "Big Brother" was about to open, last night, its eleventh edition. And all
down to quiver of disgust and impatience, all to criticize this program useless, silly, negative educational impact etc etc ...
Too bad "Big Brother", or rather call it the "Great Half-brother," not plagiarism to the original, is broadcast every day of the year on all channels.
was it not a proper anticipation of today's most popular reality show on all TV networks - the case of Sarah Scazzi - the episode of "Chi l'ha visto?" October 7, when live, a video camera placed in the home of relatives of the girl followed the reactions and comments of his family to the news of the discovery of the body and the confession of his uncle?
What are the differences between the camera that captures the foolishness of the sixteen Obtuse the format of Mediaset and the camera that follows, both live and deferred, the protagonists of the tragedy Avetrana?
And tell me that "poor Sarah's mother ..." or "drama that also the daughter of his uncle Michael ..." !
I do not feel sorry, neither. I do not feel sorry for those who agree to appear on TV, not to broadcast an appeal in the hope that someone help her - which would be understandable - but by agreeing to show off their pain or make their feelings on public show .
And not even say that these people are "victims" of a mechanism taking advantage of their weaknesses in order to better "sell" in a battle fought with strokes of shares, which have suffered the tragedy. Disgusting
certainly causing me the troubles sketched teleimbonitori that altruism and programs are built journalistic successes, but an opinion not so different - I personally - I give to those who agree to sell, worse than a prostitute, his conscience by putting in place and thus revealing their emotions, their pains, their intimacy with slobbering teleutente.
Which, in turn, has all the details of morbidly teletragedia with the same curiosity that would raise the vision of a porn show, is the detail that makes the picture - they say - and more the fact that the tragic (the only side that should be shared humanity reflect on the ultimate meaning of our lives and give, that yes, warning about the consequences of our actions and our thoughts) the interest is focused on the details, of course, are gradually doth the greater glory of teleimbonitori and most of lust telecretini: crying uncle, the girl's diaries, the destruction of the corpse, the interviews with "stars" etc etc
A framework, therefore, distressing.
gabelle And all this is as "right and duty of information", an expression of "freedom." But
information, I say, is an expression of "freedom" when it is correct and useful.
The morbid curiosity, drooling is a social fact is protectable?
The "right and duty of information" also includes the obscene spectacle of the details, of human misery, of aspects, which are deep or abyss, of our consciousness?
The answer is no.
and fascism had been given the same response, limiting the publication of the crime only to a minimum.
a good father.
While this democracy is only a "big brother", and pornocrate abbruttente.
We have been informed of this by advertising for a long time that the Channel 5 "Big Brother" was about to open, last night, its eleventh edition. And all
down to quiver of disgust and impatience, all to criticize this program useless, silly, negative educational impact etc etc ...
Too bad "Big Brother", or rather call it the "Great Half-brother," not plagiarism to the original, is broadcast every day of the year on all channels.
was it not a proper anticipation of today's most popular reality show on all TV networks - the case of Sarah Scazzi - the episode of "Chi l'ha visto?" October 7, when live, a video camera placed in the home of relatives of the girl followed the reactions and comments of his family to the news of the discovery of the body and the confession of his uncle?
What are the differences between the camera that captures the foolishness of the sixteen Obtuse the format of Mediaset and the camera that follows, both live and deferred, the protagonists of the tragedy Avetrana?
And tell me that "poor Sarah's mother ..." or "drama that also the daughter of his uncle Michael ..." !
I do not feel sorry, neither. I do not feel sorry for those who agree to appear on TV, not to broadcast an appeal in the hope that someone help her - which would be understandable - but by agreeing to show off their pain or make their feelings on public show .
And not even say that these people are "victims" of a mechanism taking advantage of their weaknesses in order to better "sell" in a battle fought with strokes of shares, which have suffered the tragedy. Disgusting
certainly causing me the troubles sketched teleimbonitori that altruism and programs are built journalistic successes, but an opinion not so different - I personally - I give to those who agree to sell, worse than a prostitute, his conscience by putting in place and thus revealing their emotions, their pains, their intimacy with slobbering teleutente.
Which, in turn, has all the details of morbidly teletragedia with the same curiosity that would raise the vision of a porn show, is the detail that makes the picture - they say - and more the fact that the tragic (the only side that should be shared humanity reflect on the ultimate meaning of our lives and give, that yes, warning about the consequences of our actions and our thoughts) the interest is focused on the details, of course, are gradually doth the greater glory of teleimbonitori and most of lust telecretini: crying uncle, the girl's diaries, the destruction of the corpse, the interviews with "stars" etc etc
A framework, therefore, distressing.
gabelle And all this is as "right and duty of information", an expression of "freedom." But
information, I say, is an expression of "freedom" when it is correct and useful.
The morbid curiosity, drooling is a social fact is protectable?
The "right and duty of information" also includes the obscene spectacle of the details, of human misery, of aspects, which are deep or abyss, of our consciousness?
The answer is no.
and fascism had been given the same response, limiting the publication of the crime only to a minimum.
a good father.
While this democracy is only a "big brother", and pornocrate abbruttente.
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Golden Spoon Online Appliation
Brothers' ITALY BEAUTY.
I have my own ideas about what has happened around the apartment in Monaco. Only the naive and clever they may think that a property located in one of the most expensive in the world, in need of renovations and repairs, deserves the same assessment of any accommodation of an average Italian city.
The value of those places was, of course, three times higher. And what makes you smile
Mr. Fini said in an appearance audiovisual released today on the Internet: "if it appears that Giancarlo is the owner of Tulliani I retire as president of the chamber." It
smile because certainly the brother of his partner is not formally "own" the apartment.
Who knows how well they work off-shore and procedures for acquisition and allocation of goods to these headers know that, normally, when you want to mask a purchase using a company incorporated under English law, located in some tropical island and move this way: 1) the seller sells the asset to a company offshore, perhaps to set up ad hoc the operation, 2) the shares of the company (capital, limited liability, the classic limited - ltd - Anglo-Saxon), always "bearer" (so they can be easily concealed or exchanged) that belong to those who have materially in the safe in the meantime received property in a trustee, or a person who is formally the right to property and prerogatives related to that on the advice of the people "trust" (ie a legal form unknown to Roman law but typical of the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition known as "equity") has created and which of course is the real dominus of the operation and is also the one who has paid up capital for the purchase of the property; 3) the tutor / creator of the trust is linked to the "trustee" of a contractual relationship under which the former has the right to request a second, which is required to perform, all the information he deems useful for the enjoyment of the property (although not legally own), including naming the beneficiary or beneficiaries of the property (including well may get the same tutor) or who can enjoy the possession and collect the revenue in the If you sell or rent. Giancarlo
Tulliani, incidentally, lived in the apartment. But not necessarily as owner of shares but as a "beneficiary" of the trust holder / owner of the shares in offshore companies which bought the property. If one day he deemed to sell the apartment can provide indications to that effect to the "trustee" who will perform in his name means, the transaction by paying the proceeds to the beneficiary or buying, always with the same mode, other property, in dell'istitutore every case the provisions of the trust.
But legally speaking, the owner is the trustee and not the one who actually enjoys the good. This alienation of property
giuruidica and full enjoyment of the property is the result of a legal system that was born from the minds of a country like England buccaneers, pirates, sea time, financial pirates today.
So when Mr. Fini put your head under the sword of Damocles, he knows perfectly well that holds the thread that is not the hair of a horse but a real rope, the kind used for the mooring of the Atlantic.
The bulky "brother" is not, legally speaking, the owner.
But there is another who must say: "The Monte Carlo Affair" was certainly a built-killeraggio political, what does not make me be clear, in solidarity with sig.Fini or remove the squalor of the operation of low-nepotism that the president has authorized the room or at least tolerated.
E 'shows the chronological succession of the former leader of the rebellion and also the first journalistic forays on the apartment Monaco, then if you put your mind to the fact that newspapers that have raised the case related to Berlusconi, that doubt is frankly ridiculous.
But I am sure that the President of the Council of Ministers has miscalculated.
This, in fact, will turn against him and, paradoxically, sympathy and votes will compact around its opponent, the victim of a plot to attack an instrumental, the arrogance of the Prime Minister; victim of his willingness to dissent from the line imposed by Berlusconi. Here's what they think, not entirely inappropriately, many. Singles
then that Berlusconi has not kept in mind the lesson that his other opponents have in the past had to learn at their own expense, the media attacks, including the judiciary (and irrespective of the real basis) eventually backfire on those who have led or However, to make acquire solidarity to those who have suffered.
more it is attacked - remember? Chairman of the Board acquired most acclaim and sympathy. The average Italian
today, accustomed for decades to the scandals of every type, general dishonesty, bribery and conduct the opaque Ministers Members and pretend indignation but ends up siding against those accused, in the game of cops and robbers rooting for the thieves, including a good family man and the pimp gives a nod to the second, between obedience to the rules and transgression prefers the latter, between the innocent and mocking the clever envying the first second.
I remember in the seventies, when the entire summit of the Social Democratic Party was heavily involved in a huge scandal (the prisons of gold), the next election the party gained votes.
Unbelievable but true. So, what wonder?
And then, at the end of my rambling these considerations I want to say that what he wrote, in closing of today's editorial in Corriere della Sera, journalist Pierluigi Battista "The threshold of decency has been crossed .... As shabby, Italy does not deserve such treatment" is a pious hypocrisy.
Italy is the one we see in newspapers and described these "treatments" is fully vaccinated. The sordid tale of cunning and Monte Carlo and the equally sleazy and sly attempt to make political capital they represent, reflect, are Italy.
Or at least the vast majority.
Sorry but note it is not.
I have my own ideas about what has happened around the apartment in Monaco. Only the naive and clever they may think that a property located in one of the most expensive in the world, in need of renovations and repairs, deserves the same assessment of any accommodation of an average Italian city.
The value of those places was, of course, three times higher. And what makes you smile
Mr. Fini said in an appearance audiovisual released today on the Internet: "if it appears that Giancarlo is the owner of Tulliani I retire as president of the chamber." It
smile because certainly the brother of his partner is not formally "own" the apartment.
Who knows how well they work off-shore and procedures for acquisition and allocation of goods to these headers know that, normally, when you want to mask a purchase using a company incorporated under English law, located in some tropical island and move this way: 1) the seller sells the asset to a company offshore, perhaps to set up ad hoc the operation, 2) the shares of the company (capital, limited liability, the classic limited - ltd - Anglo-Saxon), always "bearer" (so they can be easily concealed or exchanged) that belong to those who have materially in the safe in the meantime received property in a trustee, or a person who is formally the right to property and prerogatives related to that on the advice of the people "trust" (ie a legal form unknown to Roman law but typical of the Anglo-Saxon legal tradition known as "equity") has created and which of course is the real dominus of the operation and is also the one who has paid up capital for the purchase of the property; 3) the tutor / creator of the trust is linked to the "trustee" of a contractual relationship under which the former has the right to request a second, which is required to perform, all the information he deems useful for the enjoyment of the property (although not legally own), including naming the beneficiary or beneficiaries of the property (including well may get the same tutor) or who can enjoy the possession and collect the revenue in the If you sell or rent. Giancarlo
Tulliani, incidentally, lived in the apartment. But not necessarily as owner of shares but as a "beneficiary" of the trust holder / owner of the shares in offshore companies which bought the property. If one day he deemed to sell the apartment can provide indications to that effect to the "trustee" who will perform in his name means, the transaction by paying the proceeds to the beneficiary or buying, always with the same mode, other property, in dell'istitutore every case the provisions of the trust.
But legally speaking, the owner is the trustee and not the one who actually enjoys the good. This alienation of property
giuruidica and full enjoyment of the property is the result of a legal system that was born from the minds of a country like England buccaneers, pirates, sea time, financial pirates today.
So when Mr. Fini put your head under the sword of Damocles, he knows perfectly well that holds the thread that is not the hair of a horse but a real rope, the kind used for the mooring of the Atlantic.
The bulky "brother" is not, legally speaking, the owner.
But there is another who must say: "The Monte Carlo Affair" was certainly a built-killeraggio political, what does not make me be clear, in solidarity with sig.Fini or remove the squalor of the operation of low-nepotism that the president has authorized the room or at least tolerated.
E 'shows the chronological succession of the former leader of the rebellion and also the first journalistic forays on the apartment Monaco, then if you put your mind to the fact that newspapers that have raised the case related to Berlusconi, that doubt is frankly ridiculous.
But I am sure that the President of the Council of Ministers has miscalculated.
This, in fact, will turn against him and, paradoxically, sympathy and votes will compact around its opponent, the victim of a plot to attack an instrumental, the arrogance of the Prime Minister; victim of his willingness to dissent from the line imposed by Berlusconi. Here's what they think, not entirely inappropriately, many. Singles
then that Berlusconi has not kept in mind the lesson that his other opponents have in the past had to learn at their own expense, the media attacks, including the judiciary (and irrespective of the real basis) eventually backfire on those who have led or However, to make acquire solidarity to those who have suffered.
more it is attacked - remember? Chairman of the Board acquired most acclaim and sympathy. The average Italian
today, accustomed for decades to the scandals of every type, general dishonesty, bribery and conduct the opaque Ministers Members and pretend indignation but ends up siding against those accused, in the game of cops and robbers rooting for the thieves, including a good family man and the pimp gives a nod to the second, between obedience to the rules and transgression prefers the latter, between the innocent and mocking the clever envying the first second.
I remember in the seventies, when the entire summit of the Social Democratic Party was heavily involved in a huge scandal (the prisons of gold), the next election the party gained votes.
Unbelievable but true. So, what wonder?
And then, at the end of my rambling these considerations I want to say that what he wrote, in closing of today's editorial in Corriere della Sera, journalist Pierluigi Battista "The threshold of decency has been crossed .... As shabby, Italy does not deserve such treatment" is a pious hypocrisy.
Italy is the one we see in newspapers and described these "treatments" is fully vaccinated. The sordid tale of cunning and Monte Carlo and the equally sleazy and sly attempt to make political capital they represent, reflect, are Italy.
Or at least the vast majority.
Sorry but note it is not.
Friday, September 24, 2010
Was The Genious Gay? Wwe
September 22, 1792 EQUINOX REPUBLICAN AND MASONIC
E 'in this very date that the French Revolution overthrew, with a vote largely influenced by fraud and violence, the oldest kingdom in Europe.
The vote of the Convention was preceded by parliamentary elections in a country, an overwhelming majority did not want the end of the monarchy but a way to constitutional reform and anticentralista. Danton wrote
"E 'in Paris to be maintained by all means. The Republicans are a tiny minority, and to fight, we can not rely on them, the rest of France is attached to the monarchy. Should scare the monarchy." He thought for a minority
active and violent to fulfill these purposes.
The opportunity to overturn a State which needed only a few changes that Louis XVI had clearly shown they want to grant was taken at the time of the election Representatives of the Convention.
Paris was held in check by the Jacobin bands that just the day on September 2 carried out a series of unprecedented massacres.
The prisons of Paris, where they were detained sympathizers of the King, the Swiss guards escaped the earlier slaughter of the Tuileries on 10 August and refractory priests (those who had not taken the oath, schismatic, and fidelity to the civil constitution of the clergy in 1790) were attacked by the crowd.
No one was spared: common criminals, aristocrats, priests were killed while the authorities stand by and watch the slaughter, were not even spared children and teenagers, shot to pieces in the fortress of Bicêtre, one hundred and fifty priests were summarily tried and killed in a Carmelite convent.
Only the partisans in 1945 in Schio, Ferrara, Vercelli, Carpi, and other military detention sites where they were kept for social justice, managed to equalize, as much as a murderous intention, the revolutionary refinements.
A thousand people were brutally massacred, and the next day, September 3, the Commune of Paris in a circular sent to all the communes of France defended these killings as the right people's reaction to a conspiracy against the nation by inviting other departments to "rush to our rescue, "or eliminate" vicious conspirators. " This
climate that accompanied the elections September, while promoting access to the vote of the strata of the population most favorable to the Jacobins, he forbade the exercise to the electoral assemblies in favor of monarchy, other meetings were forced to vote by open ballot in crowded classrooms by armed sans-culottes.
In this way the will of a few thousand Jacobins in Paris has prevailed for some 700,000, and even other departments was established in the roll call of commissioners have come under pressure from Paris and refused the right to vote to persons suspected of monarchical ideas .
contends that over 7 million members to vote only expressed the 600,000 eligible.
the rigged elections followed by another scam that is the procedure that leading to the decree of abolition of the monarchy voted by a Convention which met in a room full of screaming crowds. Of the 749 members did not vote more than 300, many others, elected in the large French territory came after the fact. The republic was decreed by the assembly made up by more than two fifths of its members. The fear of not being able to replace a government constitutional monarchy with a republican government where the totality of members had taken part in the vote, urged the minority to urgently adopt the resolution.
September 21 were heard, among the speakers of the Convention, such statements: "All the dynasties that have not been devouring the races that lived on human flesh" or "I Kings are in the moral order what monsters are in the physical, the courts are the laboratory of the crime and the den of tyrants. "
Faced acclamation of the populace armed and foaming with rage no one had the courage to resist . And so after a quick vote unanimously the Convention decreed the abolition of the monarchy by inserting the following day, September 22, through a correction of the minutes of the previous day, the term "Republic".
which was proclaimed by a minority of members, intimidated by the atmosphere of excitement and threat, without even waiting for the meeting was convened to complete.
But the fall of the monarchy could not stop at mere formal; not enough, you must kill the father, it was necessary to "the death of Louis XVI to the country alive," as called for (but worth hissing its auspices as unquestionable orders) Robespierre. The father was killed and killing not only the monarchy but the whole order of which the age-old King of France was the key. Anointed protector of the Church, Christ's representative on earth, his killing was intended to destroy the bond between the king - and therefore Christ and the Church - and France and, consequently, to destroy an entire civilization that had developed slowly in Western Europe. In its place is established a world view deeply secularized, putting in place of Sovereignty (divine) nature rather a divinely revealed.
anti-Catholic spirit shows its original expression September 10, 1793 when in its "Report on the heroic of the Republic" presented to the Convention, the astronomer Gilbert Romme, affiliated with the Lodge of Nine Sisters, suggested the Republican calendar, clearly resembling the Masonic .
mocking the Christian era, described as the era of "cruelty" and "slavery" and denying ila Christian tradition, the project to reassess the ancestral traditions of the Egyptians and Babylonians; Romme noted that "when the Republic was proclaimed on September 22, 1792, at 9 o'clock, 18 minutes and 30 seconds in the morning, the sun had reached the actual equinox, entering the sign Balance "commenting on" the equality of day and night was affirmed by the sky at the moment in which the moral and civil equality was proclaimed by representatives of the French people as the sacred foundation of his new government. So the sun has passed from one hemisphere to another the same day that the people triumphing against royal oppression is passed from monarchy to a republican government. "
The revolution was thus conceived as a return to pagan origins.
Ed chaos took possession of the rulers of the Republic. Churches burned and looted, monuments destroyed, erased all traces of the past, all mixed up with measures to discourage the people from the ancient religious practice to at the height of the proclamation, by Order of Robespierre on May 7, 1794, the Masonic cult of the Supreme Being, founder of the new civic religion.
It is in this atmosphere of sordid, savage, bestial oppression and anti-Catholic antimonarchical that joins the revolt in the Vendée, but that's another story.
Rembarre!
E 'in this very date that the French Revolution overthrew, with a vote largely influenced by fraud and violence, the oldest kingdom in Europe.
The vote of the Convention was preceded by parliamentary elections in a country, an overwhelming majority did not want the end of the monarchy but a way to constitutional reform and anticentralista. Danton wrote
"E 'in Paris to be maintained by all means. The Republicans are a tiny minority, and to fight, we can not rely on them, the rest of France is attached to the monarchy. Should scare the monarchy." He thought for a minority
active and violent to fulfill these purposes.
The opportunity to overturn a State which needed only a few changes that Louis XVI had clearly shown they want to grant was taken at the time of the election Representatives of the Convention.
Paris was held in check by the Jacobin bands that just the day on September 2 carried out a series of unprecedented massacres.
The prisons of Paris, where they were detained sympathizers of the King, the Swiss guards escaped the earlier slaughter of the Tuileries on 10 August and refractory priests (those who had not taken the oath, schismatic, and fidelity to the civil constitution of the clergy in 1790) were attacked by the crowd.
No one was spared: common criminals, aristocrats, priests were killed while the authorities stand by and watch the slaughter, were not even spared children and teenagers, shot to pieces in the fortress of Bicêtre, one hundred and fifty priests were summarily tried and killed in a Carmelite convent.
Only the partisans in 1945 in Schio, Ferrara, Vercelli, Carpi, and other military detention sites where they were kept for social justice, managed to equalize, as much as a murderous intention, the revolutionary refinements.
A thousand people were brutally massacred, and the next day, September 3, the Commune of Paris in a circular sent to all the communes of France defended these killings as the right people's reaction to a conspiracy against the nation by inviting other departments to "rush to our rescue, "or eliminate" vicious conspirators. " This
climate that accompanied the elections September, while promoting access to the vote of the strata of the population most favorable to the Jacobins, he forbade the exercise to the electoral assemblies in favor of monarchy, other meetings were forced to vote by open ballot in crowded classrooms by armed sans-culottes.
In this way the will of a few thousand Jacobins in Paris has prevailed for some 700,000, and even other departments was established in the roll call of commissioners have come under pressure from Paris and refused the right to vote to persons suspected of monarchical ideas .
contends that over 7 million members to vote only expressed the 600,000 eligible.
the rigged elections followed by another scam that is the procedure that leading to the decree of abolition of the monarchy voted by a Convention which met in a room full of screaming crowds. Of the 749 members did not vote more than 300, many others, elected in the large French territory came after the fact. The republic was decreed by the assembly made up by more than two fifths of its members. The fear of not being able to replace a government constitutional monarchy with a republican government where the totality of members had taken part in the vote, urged the minority to urgently adopt the resolution.
September 21 were heard, among the speakers of the Convention, such statements: "All the dynasties that have not been devouring the races that lived on human flesh" or "I Kings are in the moral order what monsters are in the physical, the courts are the laboratory of the crime and the den of tyrants. "
Faced acclamation of the populace armed and foaming with rage no one had the courage to resist . And so after a quick vote unanimously the Convention decreed the abolition of the monarchy by inserting the following day, September 22, through a correction of the minutes of the previous day, the term "Republic".
which was proclaimed by a minority of members, intimidated by the atmosphere of excitement and threat, without even waiting for the meeting was convened to complete.
But the fall of the monarchy could not stop at mere formal; not enough, you must kill the father, it was necessary to "the death of Louis XVI to the country alive," as called for (but worth hissing its auspices as unquestionable orders) Robespierre. The father was killed and killing not only the monarchy but the whole order of which the age-old King of France was the key. Anointed protector of the Church, Christ's representative on earth, his killing was intended to destroy the bond between the king - and therefore Christ and the Church - and France and, consequently, to destroy an entire civilization that had developed slowly in Western Europe. In its place is established a world view deeply secularized, putting in place of Sovereignty (divine) nature rather a divinely revealed.
anti-Catholic spirit shows its original expression September 10, 1793 when in its "Report on the heroic of the Republic" presented to the Convention, the astronomer Gilbert Romme, affiliated with the Lodge of Nine Sisters, suggested the Republican calendar, clearly resembling the Masonic .
mocking the Christian era, described as the era of "cruelty" and "slavery" and denying ila Christian tradition, the project to reassess the ancestral traditions of the Egyptians and Babylonians; Romme noted that "when the Republic was proclaimed on September 22, 1792, at 9 o'clock, 18 minutes and 30 seconds in the morning, the sun had reached the actual equinox, entering the sign Balance "commenting on" the equality of day and night was affirmed by the sky at the moment in which the moral and civil equality was proclaimed by representatives of the French people as the sacred foundation of his new government. So the sun has passed from one hemisphere to another the same day that the people triumphing against royal oppression is passed from monarchy to a republican government. "
The revolution was thus conceived as a return to pagan origins.
Ed chaos took possession of the rulers of the Republic. Churches burned and looted, monuments destroyed, erased all traces of the past, all mixed up with measures to discourage the people from the ancient religious practice to at the height of the proclamation, by Order of Robespierre on May 7, 1794, the Masonic cult of the Supreme Being, founder of the new civic religion.
It is in this atmosphere of sordid, savage, bestial oppression and anti-Catholic antimonarchical that joins the revolt in the Vendée, but that's another story.
Rembarre!
Tuesday, September 21, 2010
If An Average Atom Of Sulfur Weighs 32.07
from cradle to grave. EVEN JUST THE TOMB.
The electoral success of the Swedish Democrats, the party that is characterized by a strong protest anti-immigrant, raises a few thoughts.
The first is that this statement comes at a country which has always enjoyed the indisputable social stability, thanks to the presence of a state which, according to a well-known definition, provided for the life of citizens "from cradle to grave", the wave of immigration that brought in the Scandinavian country nearly two million people (not counting hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants) in contrast to a population of nine million has obviously put in a check that system, causing the fall of the socialist government in power uninterruptedly for a hundred years. The Social thus its physiological limits and the breast of the public is not inexhaustible, and remains to see who should be their children to feed, those who built the state or the newcomers. And on this dilemma I'll have someone in Europe, begin to establish the rules and, above all, of the priority. And from now.
A second consideration is the nature of semantics. Some newspapers have
marks around the word "democratic" party, referring to Jimmie Akesson, obviously sarcastic in tone, sottolinenadone nature "xenophobic" and, therefore, very little "democratic".
But what is democratic and what is not? If you consult a manual of constitutional law, we learn that democracy is nothing more than a form of government, ie a method of obtaining consent through an 'election by universal suffrage, the representatives who bear this popular mandate, will provide to govern.
So democracy should be, strictly speaking, those who accept this method and the results that come from popular suffrage regardless of its ideological, ethnic, social or religious. His conscience and his culture have nothing to do with the statistical calculation of preferences.
And here I ask a good question. Quid iuris
if voters a majority, shall instruct their elected representatives to dissolve the rooms and other constitutional institutions for the establishment, as I know, a directory with absolute power and unlimited for one, two, five, ten years?
What should make democratically, the elected? In accordance with the principle of democratic representation they should execute the mandate given to them following the directions and as far received.
Otherwise, the principle of "government of the people" which democratically chosen, it would be circumvented, mocked, violated.
But all what would be considered (from the current "democratic") "undemocratic" for the simple reason that the democratic system, by "consensus procedure code" was filling up with ideological content soaking liberal principles which, in turn, a curious paradox well could be - and are indeed existed - even in countries and limited guarantees democratic schemes (with limited suffrage, for example). And so the rise
refined synthesis "liberal-democratic": the people can decide (democratically) but in the circle of the options that the lords of the money economy (liberal, that is generous between them, because they share the market herd people in the same way you assign a pro-rata, banks and market share) show. And with
barriers, limitations and obstacles that, in fact, allow the formations "liberals" (who are conservative or reformist) to manage the majority of power or the political opposition.
And every time it appears some training antisystemic - conservative, fascist, nationalist, but not controlled - it happens that it sticks to its "antidemocraticitá", even if they participate regularly in elections, accepting the current constitutional system, and you try to enable it to not be able to grow, isolating or criminalization, until devise electoral laws that would allow it to elect representatives to parliament. There
nell'angolino not to give too much bother. Which proves, if proof were needed, the totalitarian nature of the liberal system. The
defiguration, dell'ideologizzazione through the concept of "democracy" is therefore used to criminalize opposition do not like, those capable of sparigliare the tables, to oppose that kind of cloying bipolarity, liberals and right liberals the left, who can only ensure the lords of money to continue to make their own comfortable on the skin of other men.
Swedes - as well as French, British, Austrians, Bulgarians, Hungarians not to name only the most important cases - have, so they, too, started to escape from this all-encompassing mechanism that, like all human constructions, it is intended to wear out through normal consumption.
allogeneic invaded by a mass equal to 20% (at least) of the population, even the prim Swedes have begun to realize that the system that for years had voted and who had guaranteed them for years, "the cradle and the grave would have ended up Reserve the first to the immigrants and their second single.
The same fate for the other Europeans. But more is not dark at midnight and dawn may well arise in Scandinavia!
The electoral success of the Swedish Democrats, the party that is characterized by a strong protest anti-immigrant, raises a few thoughts.
The first is that this statement comes at a country which has always enjoyed the indisputable social stability, thanks to the presence of a state which, according to a well-known definition, provided for the life of citizens "from cradle to grave", the wave of immigration that brought in the Scandinavian country nearly two million people (not counting hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants) in contrast to a population of nine million has obviously put in a check that system, causing the fall of the socialist government in power uninterruptedly for a hundred years. The Social thus its physiological limits and the breast of the public is not inexhaustible, and remains to see who should be their children to feed, those who built the state or the newcomers. And on this dilemma I'll have someone in Europe, begin to establish the rules and, above all, of the priority. And from now.
A second consideration is the nature of semantics. Some newspapers have
marks around the word "democratic" party, referring to Jimmie Akesson, obviously sarcastic in tone, sottolinenadone nature "xenophobic" and, therefore, very little "democratic".
But what is democratic and what is not? If you consult a manual of constitutional law, we learn that democracy is nothing more than a form of government, ie a method of obtaining consent through an 'election by universal suffrage, the representatives who bear this popular mandate, will provide to govern.
So democracy should be, strictly speaking, those who accept this method and the results that come from popular suffrage regardless of its ideological, ethnic, social or religious. His conscience and his culture have nothing to do with the statistical calculation of preferences.
And here I ask a good question. Quid iuris
if voters a majority, shall instruct their elected representatives to dissolve the rooms and other constitutional institutions for the establishment, as I know, a directory with absolute power and unlimited for one, two, five, ten years?
What should make democratically, the elected? In accordance with the principle of democratic representation they should execute the mandate given to them following the directions and as far received.
Otherwise, the principle of "government of the people" which democratically chosen, it would be circumvented, mocked, violated.
But all what would be considered (from the current "democratic") "undemocratic" for the simple reason that the democratic system, by "consensus procedure code" was filling up with ideological content soaking liberal principles which, in turn, a curious paradox well could be - and are indeed existed - even in countries and limited guarantees democratic schemes (with limited suffrage, for example). And so the rise
refined synthesis "liberal-democratic": the people can decide (democratically) but in the circle of the options that the lords of the money economy (liberal, that is generous between them, because they share the market herd people in the same way you assign a pro-rata, banks and market share) show. And with
barriers, limitations and obstacles that, in fact, allow the formations "liberals" (who are conservative or reformist) to manage the majority of power or the political opposition.
And every time it appears some training antisystemic - conservative, fascist, nationalist, but not controlled - it happens that it sticks to its "antidemocraticitá", even if they participate regularly in elections, accepting the current constitutional system, and you try to enable it to not be able to grow, isolating or criminalization, until devise electoral laws that would allow it to elect representatives to parliament. There
nell'angolino not to give too much bother. Which proves, if proof were needed, the totalitarian nature of the liberal system. The
defiguration, dell'ideologizzazione through the concept of "democracy" is therefore used to criminalize opposition do not like, those capable of sparigliare the tables, to oppose that kind of cloying bipolarity, liberals and right liberals the left, who can only ensure the lords of money to continue to make their own comfortable on the skin of other men.
Swedes - as well as French, British, Austrians, Bulgarians, Hungarians not to name only the most important cases - have, so they, too, started to escape from this all-encompassing mechanism that, like all human constructions, it is intended to wear out through normal consumption.
allogeneic invaded by a mass equal to 20% (at least) of the population, even the prim Swedes have begun to realize that the system that for years had voted and who had guaranteed them for years, "the cradle and the grave would have ended up Reserve the first to the immigrants and their second single.
The same fate for the other Europeans. But more is not dark at midnight and dawn may well arise in Scandinavia!
Thursday, September 9, 2010
Burst Capillaries On Lip
BAGASCIOPAPPONFROCIOMACHIA
But there then any wonder? The words spoken by MEP Finian Angela Napoli that "a woman to have a certain position in the list (meaning, for real hope of election) is also often forced into prostitution or otherwise to satisfy those who are the political will of the master of the moment" they did scandal at the MPs, especially those - who knows why! - The pidielle.
Which, you know, are all known people in the world of culture, art, science and profession and therefore the high backed chairs call for political virtues. The words of the deputy Finian
have reacted listing of complaints, gnashing of teeth, requests for an apology. To which last
s'associa Mr Fini who certainly nothing to be feared, As the reputation of Mrs. Tulliani, the remarks of Mrs. Napoli, his company is definitely not suspected of having prostituted herself to get a parliamentary seat, the fact Gaucci never figures in politics and gained a new family of Mr. Fini is to RAI-TV acclaimed for his artistic, cultural, business.
Then, probably, he felt called upon him.
But it does not explain why and why now.
The "good fight" the president of the Chamber and former president of an, which is why a noblewoman so generous as naïve (the two words betray a common etymological root because they express the same attitude, that dell'elevatezza mood, belonging to the "gens" of ancient Roman memory alien to low cunning of the populace) the gift, as representative of the national right, a number of properties, it is dissolved in the swamps of the duplicity, the double standards of voltagabbanesimo.
In a word, the worst political opportunism with which what was said yesterday and today can not claim the promises and proclamations undertake only those who receive them but not who says them.
"I recorded the collaborative will of many comrades, young and old ... We will try to actualize our dream, proving that there are elements in fascism very valid for the Italian company ... No one can conceive fascism as hell fell on Italy, "said the 12/15/1987.
"... Fascism had guessed that the man is at the heart of becoming and can not be subject to material logic. Fascism was also understood that the state and nation can not be separated and that the problems in the workplace are not resolved by capitalism nor communism. Recipes are also applicable to today's Italy. This is the fascism of 2000 "said the 18/12/1987.
These words were processed and issued from the same vocal chords, from the same brain, by the same mouth of those who then start to look forward to voting and citizenship agl'immigrati, the will biological, rights to homosexual couples and, in a sickening effort to ridicule the low opportunism, came to say, kippah on his head and assumed the form of vibrating tongue lapping the soles of the Zionists, that "Fascism was the absolute evil "(23/11/2003).
But not for this I believe Mr Fini's a bitch, it has not sold out of its own nothingness.
He is, rather, a pimp, and has sold off a body and soul that were not his, it belonged to him but that was to be the faithful guardian.
Not that that body was chaste, no soul that had not its spots, the history of the MSI and the human community that composed it was made of lights and many shadows but it was better than nothing and the sacrifices and hopes, the blood and sweat poured from many in some measure redeemed the sins, even serious ones, which were committed by those who had driven, in very difficult years is fair to say, the fluctuating fortunes.
Li has sold off his personal ambition for the rider and its power system, which has had the opportunity to know well and whose flaws he shared unflinchingly for over fifteen years but from which he now wants to free itself in a hypocritical jerk of neoverginitá.
The same now has infected his former colonels, small papponcelli second measure, which the reproach to which the twists and turns, however, they themselves have witnessed undeterred, they, too, for over fifteen years from the contest looked well, and often competing with him as a political weather vane.
Who will win the race to the conscience of the most beautiful bidet?.
And to conclude this beautiful sequence of high political battles, that's what the newspapers reported today.
Mr. Enzo Raisi, Deputy finiano of Bologna, has been called by Representative Capezzone, spokesman pidielle. In the event of Mirabello
Finian waving the flags of the association destrafrociale "gaylib" and, to the criticisms made by some members of the PDL, the Rais replied, recalling respectfully - abnormal - Capezzone of sexual orientation.
Which, in turn, blamed his colleague for raising deputy a "private matter".
"No, no - replied on Raisi - I swear it was a compliment," recalling how they were found in his words, he had instead cited the Capezzone "as an example of great courage, having made the outing in the state their bisexuality. "
What can I say? Italian democracy, its leaders and its virtues are as follows. Everyone should draw the consequences.
As for your humble ..... There he whispers "REMBARRE" and he does quietly, gently, without shouting, but forcefully addressing the minority of Italians that he has not yet surrendered to the democratic and screaming vulgarity of recent times past. The
But there then any wonder? The words spoken by MEP Finian Angela Napoli that "a woman to have a certain position in the list (meaning, for real hope of election) is also often forced into prostitution or otherwise to satisfy those who are the political will of the master of the moment" they did scandal at the MPs, especially those - who knows why! - The pidielle.
Which, you know, are all known people in the world of culture, art, science and profession and therefore the high backed chairs call for political virtues. The words of the deputy Finian
have reacted listing of complaints, gnashing of teeth, requests for an apology. To which last
s'associa Mr Fini who certainly nothing to be feared, As the reputation of Mrs. Tulliani, the remarks of Mrs. Napoli, his company is definitely not suspected of having prostituted herself to get a parliamentary seat, the fact Gaucci never figures in politics and gained a new family of Mr. Fini is to RAI-TV acclaimed for his artistic, cultural, business.
Then, probably, he felt called upon him.
But it does not explain why and why now.
The "good fight" the president of the Chamber and former president of an, which is why a noblewoman so generous as naïve (the two words betray a common etymological root because they express the same attitude, that dell'elevatezza mood, belonging to the "gens" of ancient Roman memory alien to low cunning of the populace) the gift, as representative of the national right, a number of properties, it is dissolved in the swamps of the duplicity, the double standards of voltagabbanesimo.
In a word, the worst political opportunism with which what was said yesterday and today can not claim the promises and proclamations undertake only those who receive them but not who says them.
"I recorded the collaborative will of many comrades, young and old ... We will try to actualize our dream, proving that there are elements in fascism very valid for the Italian company ... No one can conceive fascism as hell fell on Italy, "said the 12/15/1987.
"... Fascism had guessed that the man is at the heart of becoming and can not be subject to material logic. Fascism was also understood that the state and nation can not be separated and that the problems in the workplace are not resolved by capitalism nor communism. Recipes are also applicable to today's Italy. This is the fascism of 2000 "said the 18/12/1987.
These words were processed and issued from the same vocal chords, from the same brain, by the same mouth of those who then start to look forward to voting and citizenship agl'immigrati, the will biological, rights to homosexual couples and, in a sickening effort to ridicule the low opportunism, came to say, kippah on his head and assumed the form of vibrating tongue lapping the soles of the Zionists, that "Fascism was the absolute evil "(23/11/2003).
But not for this I believe Mr Fini's a bitch, it has not sold out of its own nothingness.
He is, rather, a pimp, and has sold off a body and soul that were not his, it belonged to him but that was to be the faithful guardian.
Not that that body was chaste, no soul that had not its spots, the history of the MSI and the human community that composed it was made of lights and many shadows but it was better than nothing and the sacrifices and hopes, the blood and sweat poured from many in some measure redeemed the sins, even serious ones, which were committed by those who had driven, in very difficult years is fair to say, the fluctuating fortunes.
Li has sold off his personal ambition for the rider and its power system, which has had the opportunity to know well and whose flaws he shared unflinchingly for over fifteen years but from which he now wants to free itself in a hypocritical jerk of neoverginitá.
The same now has infected his former colonels, small papponcelli second measure, which the reproach to which the twists and turns, however, they themselves have witnessed undeterred, they, too, for over fifteen years from the contest looked well, and often competing with him as a political weather vane.
Who will win the race to the conscience of the most beautiful bidet?.
And to conclude this beautiful sequence of high political battles, that's what the newspapers reported today.
Mr. Enzo Raisi, Deputy finiano of Bologna, has been called by Representative Capezzone, spokesman pidielle. In the event of Mirabello
Finian waving the flags of the association destrafrociale "gaylib" and, to the criticisms made by some members of the PDL, the Rais replied, recalling respectfully - abnormal - Capezzone of sexual orientation.
Which, in turn, blamed his colleague for raising deputy a "private matter".
"No, no - replied on Raisi - I swear it was a compliment," recalling how they were found in his words, he had instead cited the Capezzone "as an example of great courage, having made the outing in the state their bisexuality. "
What can I say? Italian democracy, its leaders and its virtues are as follows. Everyone should draw the consequences.
As for your humble ..... There he whispers "REMBARRE" and he does quietly, gently, without shouting, but forcefully addressing the minority of Italians that he has not yet surrendered to the democratic and screaming vulgarity of recent times past. The
Sunday, September 5, 2010
Sample Wedding Contribution Cards
UNFAIR COMPETITION
market forces are not discussed, are absolute dogma.
Among these, free competition represents the most authentic expression.
We knew about all this but it is not at all agree Ramira (on) a transsexual Italian and working in Bologna.
He complains of what is happening in the Fair, where a camper parked on the street attracts the attention of males of all ages. Inside, two striking red dresses transgender / ee rather scollacciati / and offer their services.
E 'tells what the "Corriere della Sera" in Bologna in an article entitled "The campers love (sic)."
"unfair competition - with his deep voice thunders Ramiro, a cross on foot and therefore disadvantaged - For the same price we offer them a benefit to the closed and protected from prying eyes while I'm on the road. E - added - are also foreign! "Our
Ramirona betrays a certain vein and protectionist nazionalpopolare! But you know, Italians are provincial and foreign products, from cars to football players to the sex stoke their appetite very exotic.
Our bellocciona so wrong and wrong two sometimes because the Lisbon Treaty and the strict European rules do not allow limitations on competition and, above all, repress ethnic discrimination! Careful Ramirona then you find that a complaint for incitement to racial hatred!
can not discriminate ! E 'banned! But
operators on prostitution, for some reason, they all have / corporatist and a certain desire, fear competition, do not want intruders / e.
And pimps know.
fact, today the rider Finian said the dissenters, whether they will stay faithful to the PDL will be re-nominated the next election. They will not be replaced by other aspiring whore.
No competition! Each will retain his street bell'angolino everything for him, to beat without problems of overcrowding, no surprise.
obviously knows his chickens, they will be prostitutes for him. But
Finian respond with indignation: "Berlusconi does not take account of our dignity."
Big words. Their dignity
rhymes with kippa! No problem for them. In Tel Aviv's have long been reserved miles of pavement.
market forces are not discussed, are absolute dogma.
Among these, free competition represents the most authentic expression.
We knew about all this but it is not at all agree Ramira (on) a transsexual Italian and working in Bologna.
He complains of what is happening in the Fair, where a camper parked on the street attracts the attention of males of all ages. Inside, two striking red dresses transgender / ee rather scollacciati / and offer their services.
E 'tells what the "Corriere della Sera" in Bologna in an article entitled "The campers love (sic)."
"unfair competition - with his deep voice thunders Ramiro, a cross on foot and therefore disadvantaged - For the same price we offer them a benefit to the closed and protected from prying eyes while I'm on the road. E - added - are also foreign! "Our
Ramirona betrays a certain vein and protectionist nazionalpopolare! But you know, Italians are provincial and foreign products, from cars to football players to the sex stoke their appetite very exotic.
Our bellocciona so wrong and wrong two sometimes because the Lisbon Treaty and the strict European rules do not allow limitations on competition and, above all, repress ethnic discrimination! Careful Ramirona then you find that a complaint for incitement to racial hatred!
can not discriminate ! E 'banned! But
operators on prostitution, for some reason, they all have / corporatist and a certain desire, fear competition, do not want intruders / e.
And pimps know.
fact, today the rider Finian said the dissenters, whether they will stay faithful to the PDL will be re-nominated the next election. They will not be replaced by other aspiring whore.
No competition! Each will retain his street bell'angolino everything for him, to beat without problems of overcrowding, no surprise.
obviously knows his chickens, they will be prostitutes for him. But
Finian respond with indignation: "Berlusconi does not take account of our dignity."
Big words. Their dignity
rhymes with kippa! No problem for them. In Tel Aviv's have long been reserved miles of pavement.
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Rom Pokemon Soul Silver Eng100
The horse and rider
will also be very practical reasons that brought Berlusconi to weave a close relationship with Gaddafi.
The construction of roads and social infrastructure on Libyan territory and the advantages that our companies could draw pimps and gl'investimenti that Libyans could do in our country are also well worth a tent pitched in the courtyard of the Libyan Embassy and the smell of shit that the horses have left the Berbers during the demonstrations in front of our horse-Bedouin (so to speak) authorities.
Arabian horses (and not only horses) certainly "Olento" but the "pecuniary" no and then I do not express myself.
instead Worth some thought the noise caused by the "keynote" in that the Bedouin Chief of Rome in the presence of five girls, three of which readily convertitesi Islam (the same result would obtain in Vanna Marchi propagate its anti evil eye) ; Italy is Christian! Han screamed leaguers (and hastily swallowing water from the hidden god Po) and well demosinistri, became fervent Catholics in a flash, all'augurio in front of a Muslim Europe!
fans laugh at the Bedouin Chief, at least he is a fool by profession. While our politicians
are involuntarily and, therefore, are even more laughter. So, dear Christians, we think, because there the tattered clothes for the tens of thousands of children killed in the womb under a law that you keep still standing? Let's think again, why not cut the nails and claws to the bankers who, thanks to legislation approved by you and kept standing s'intascano stratospheric rents in spite of the principles of the "fair return" that the Church has repeatedly stated during the centuries? Instead of showing indignation at the Great Bedouin farts because they do not obey the Ten Commandments, repeatedly mocked by you?
But now let 's talk about serious things. It's not just
the business that gave rise to the unique friendship between our President and Head of the Bedouin, but in my opinion, there is a half of real love, a true "elective affinity."
The similarities are indeed striking character. When the Bedouin
Head goes to harangue the audience of five hundred girls by giving them a "Quran" there are perhaps reminded of the early years when the "bosses' Forza Italy" (which hardly could be distinguished from rallies dianetic or the Scientologists) were distributed agl'intervenuti of cases with all the "necessity" for the disciple Berlusconi?
Both are true then the comedians, the jokes told by Berlusconi and his verve are known facts, to shoot the Bedouin Head (Gaddafi goes back to the 'fascist Italy, which was not - according to him - Italy "- then what was it? a walrus? a slipper? a molar tooth? - that colonization but was at a couple of decades earlier) that rival those of our evolved Toto, is added a fisique du rôle respectable, look carefully at his last pictures. It does not seem made for interpreting the stand of the legendary "rubbish", the cop beggar?
Bad taste makes then as a master in both the friends.
not to mention the hassle of female company. The Amazons of Gaddafi and the five hundred young women hired to take part in Italian the "keynote" in the Koran have aroused the envy of our eternal young man always in the throes of uncontrollable hormonal storms. I wonder if the role of ministers as well as our sample also will include some of his wins inside the army. But the real
sharing is a much less funny question.
Driven by Gaddafi in 1970 and stripped of all their property, twenty thousand Italians then expect compensation. Berlusconi had promised them, and had inserted the clause on compensation in the Italian-Libyan Treaty of 2008. But she has not got a euro. Here is another point in common between the two friends, both have kicked ass in those Italians.
Not bad. Do not count nothing, only twenty thousand and the knight in the polls, made up of percentages, do not even notice it. The Italians
respectable remember these our unfortunate compatriots, and the rider, however, dispatched an ideally bell'involto poo Horse of the Bedouins. Do not be offended, is already used to. His partner has already made him swallow in large quantities.
Porto
will also be very practical reasons that brought Berlusconi to weave a close relationship with Gaddafi.
The construction of roads and social infrastructure on Libyan territory and the advantages that our companies could draw pimps and gl'investimenti that Libyans could do in our country are also well worth a tent pitched in the courtyard of the Libyan Embassy and the smell of shit that the horses have left the Berbers during the demonstrations in front of our horse-Bedouin (so to speak) authorities.
Arabian horses (and not only horses) certainly "Olento" but the "pecuniary" no and then I do not express myself.
instead Worth some thought the noise caused by the "keynote" in that the Bedouin Chief of Rome in the presence of five girls, three of which readily convertitesi Islam (the same result would obtain in Vanna Marchi propagate its anti evil eye) ; Italy is Christian! Han screamed leaguers (and hastily swallowing water from the hidden god Po) and well demosinistri, became fervent Catholics in a flash, all'augurio in front of a Muslim Europe!
fans laugh at the Bedouin Chief, at least he is a fool by profession. While our politicians
are involuntarily and, therefore, are even more laughter. So, dear Christians, we think, because there the tattered clothes for the tens of thousands of children killed in the womb under a law that you keep still standing? Let's think again, why not cut the nails and claws to the bankers who, thanks to legislation approved by you and kept standing s'intascano stratospheric rents in spite of the principles of the "fair return" that the Church has repeatedly stated during the centuries? Instead of showing indignation at the Great Bedouin farts because they do not obey the Ten Commandments, repeatedly mocked by you?
But now let 's talk about serious things. It's not just
the business that gave rise to the unique friendship between our President and Head of the Bedouin, but in my opinion, there is a half of real love, a true "elective affinity."
The similarities are indeed striking character. When the Bedouin
Head goes to harangue the audience of five hundred girls by giving them a "Quran" there are perhaps reminded of the early years when the "bosses' Forza Italy" (which hardly could be distinguished from rallies dianetic or the Scientologists) were distributed agl'intervenuti of cases with all the "necessity" for the disciple Berlusconi?
Both are true then the comedians, the jokes told by Berlusconi and his verve are known facts, to shoot the Bedouin Head (Gaddafi goes back to the 'fascist Italy, which was not - according to him - Italy "- then what was it? a walrus? a slipper? a molar tooth? - that colonization but was at a couple of decades earlier) that rival those of our evolved Toto, is added a fisique du rôle respectable, look carefully at his last pictures. It does not seem made for interpreting the stand of the legendary "rubbish", the cop beggar?
Bad taste makes then as a master in both the friends.
not to mention the hassle of female company. The Amazons of Gaddafi and the five hundred young women hired to take part in Italian the "keynote" in the Koran have aroused the envy of our eternal young man always in the throes of uncontrollable hormonal storms. I wonder if the role of ministers as well as our sample also will include some of his wins inside the army. But the real
sharing is a much less funny question.
Driven by Gaddafi in 1970 and stripped of all their property, twenty thousand Italians then expect compensation. Berlusconi had promised them, and had inserted the clause on compensation in the Italian-Libyan Treaty of 2008. But she has not got a euro. Here is another point in common between the two friends, both have kicked ass in those Italians.
Not bad. Do not count nothing, only twenty thousand and the knight in the polls, made up of percentages, do not even notice it. The Italians
respectable remember these our unfortunate compatriots, and the rider, however, dispatched an ideally bell'involto poo Horse of the Bedouins. Do not be offended, is already used to. His partner has already made him swallow in large quantities.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)