To what extent should or should not concern us - we Italians and Europe belong to which good or evil, for historical reasons, ethnic and geopolitical well before the rise of the bureaucratic dictatorship of Maastricht, Lisbon and Brussels - the fighting between the robbers Libya, Gaddafi pro-and anti?
Just look at the map to understand that what concerns us greatly and not only because it provides us with the Libyan oil and is a gateway to Africa but because the history of immigration is reshaping the Mediterranean basin as a focal point of future balances world.
started declining hill discoveries of new worlds and shifting the focus of economic interests more and more powers to the west hill European while trying for a long time the tiller firmly in their hands, the resulting atlantizzazione of trade contributed decisively to the loss of influence of the turkish and its progressive economic marginalization, political and military, which culminated with his break-up, last chapter of that process of decay, and with it the loss of vitality of Islam, understood as the will to power generated by states or nations followers of Mohammed, which in its expansionist policy of Turkey had found the most complete expression.
Each analysis must be conducted "frigid pacatoque mind" then leave by prejudices, ideological proclivities, resentment, sympathy.
Gaddafi is a scoundrel who has humiliated Italy - which in turn enabled it to him though - robbing tens of thousands of our fellow citizens and Tripoli, he consented, was for decades a channel of international terrorism, and these not inconsiderable historical precedent we should however not serve already as blind to the reasons of revenge, but more as a yardstick for assessing the psychology and thus the possible reactions of the Libyan satrap.
At the same time avoiding the temptation to fall away, as do those who saw him as the defender of its people and its national interests, and a priori ideological lines up against his opponent.
and ask but whether these deep turmoil in the Muslim world
- together with a repositioning of a Turkey filooccidentale less and less, less and less "secular" and walked after the Kemalist parentheses, for a re-Islamization of their society - are not the symptom of a worrying strong Islamic revival, or at least can act as a detonator, already piqued by the brutal conduct of the bandit Zionist state and the short-sighted U.S. policy in the Middle East as well as from philanthropic apathy of Europe the awakening of the Islamic dream is now favored by increased importance of the Mediterranean freed from the grip of the bipolar Cold War, because European interests intersect here, the Islamic-Islamic, US-Zionist and even the Russians, the latter through its military bases in the Mediterranean which is the offshoot of the Black Sea, which faces the Eurasia Caucasian litmus test of the power relations between Washington and Moscow.
The maritime border that separates the south of Europe from the Maghreb is still simmering, just like many centuries ago and the fire that is warming is fueled not only by oil but never tamed by Islamic fervor, and expansion of revenge; not to mention that Islam is already present in Europe (Bosnia, Albania and the bandit regime in Kosovo), albeit reduced from whore to U.S. interests.
This needed to be perhaps put in account when we prepared to intervene; Gaddafi was whether or not the lesser evil and / or what assurances he could provide to the opposing party, albeit varied interests of European states.
but should get out of their lenses, fisheye, democracy and human rights in international relations - and even less in the Libyan
scenario - do not matter a damn, and that in fact none of the players in the world (China and Russia in first place) in contrast to Europe (but is a weak pop) would dream of fork (the U.S., yes, but using slow-fixing) and face the reality, which reveals things clear: first, that Islam , bridgehead of Islam, is already deeply penetrated Our territory is being resurfaced and the balance on the scene throwing their demographic strength, a remarkable aggressiveness often associated with fanaticism, and, last but not least, his desire for revenge.
Second, that this opposition in the U.S. geopolitical playing a double game: on the one hand and guide the spearhead of the 'West' in the fight against international terrorism, a role that allows Washington to dictate to their targets and strategies for minority members and, second, an ally of Islam is an anti-Russian is running the weakening of our continent both in terms of a possible boycott of the Moscow-closer Europe (Bosnia, Kosovo, Chechnya, pressure on Brussels to the entry of Turkey in Europe).
E 'for this operation that the anti-Gaddafi seems to be born under bad omens: the disagreement between the two major continental powers, which emphasizes the non-existence of Europe as geopolitical, the presence of Great Britain and, above all' U.S. support, they will primarily benefit the pole and the Anglo American strategy for the control of energy sources, all claims once again masquerading as humanitarian aid to the people and that the rebels, and who knows whether the breath elbowing Italian in search of a leading role in the military operation in progress can guarantee a future to maintain the current oil supply Libya.
And even if he can avoid the apocalyptic invasion - already prophetically announced by Jean Raspail in the "Camp of the Saints" - which now no longer looks like a ghost away but already shows signs with real and distressing, harbinger of the resurgence of heavy ' a clash civilizzazionale
already re-started and that over seven hundred years ago it only changed fighting techniques. Lampedusa
And if they are realizing at his own expense, abandoned by an Italian state incapable of even muttering the word "no" as in an irreversible coma and a still distressing to find herself, their brave response shows, however, the electrocardiogram of nation is not yet completely flat.
